
Is the Brussels Effect Fading?
As Europe attempts to boost competitiveness, it struggles to avoid Washington’s gravitational pull on tech policy.
Minerva Technology Futures is a geopolitical and policy intelligence firm focused on artificial intelligence and its associated technology stack.
Whether you are a large multinational technology company, an enterprising startup, a life sciences company, a financial institution, or a global manufacturer, we understand the technologies, politics, and policy files that affect your business, growth plans, and supply chains.
Our exclusive focus on the geopolitics of tech helps us offer relevant, targeted, and forward-looking advice about how to navigate these critical issues.

As Europe attempts to boost competitiveness, it struggles to avoid Washington’s gravitational pull on tech policy.

The New York Times: “Emily Benson, the head of strategy at Minerva Technology Futures, a consultancy, said it was ‘sort of surprising’ that the United States didn’t seem to anticipate that other countries would develop similar systems. She added, ‘It was just a matter of time.”

In the race to control semiconductor technology transfers, the United States has clearly been setting the pace for years. Europe, for its part, is now deploying an economic security agenda that puts the prevention of tech leakage in semiconductors at the top of its priorities. But where does Washington stand today? Are we witnessing a strategic shift in its approach to China, in preparation for a bilateral deal? Institut Montaigne asked three questions to Emily Benson, Head of Strategy at Minerva Technology Futures.
Minerva’s weekly newsletter on technology and geopolitics
We help the world’s leading organizations understand, navigate, and respond to technology policy issues that will determine how industries evolve, economies grow, and nations compete in the 21st century.